SOCIAL PROTECTION IN THE PHILIPPINES:
Learning From Some Good Practices
With the end in view of evaluating initiatives on the extension of social
protection for homebased and other workers in the informal sector in the
Philippines, a research project was undertaken with support from the Ford
Foundation.
Through a survey, followed by FGDs and key informant interviews, the
study examined the ways by which homebased workers address risks such
as sickness, death, disability, old age, childbirth, calamities, and other
life reversals in the context of their current working and living conditions.
For the evaluation of pilot and existing social protection schemes,
six information-rich PATAMABA areas were selected as case study sites:
1) the PATAMABA damayan (mutual aid society) in San Francisco, Bulacan,
Bulacan, which has more than 200 members, and which is “branching
out” from death benefits to sickness benefits through a memorandum
of agreement with a nearby hospital; 2) the PATAMABA Apugan chapter in
Baguio City (Cordillera Administrative Region) composed mostly of migrant
indigenous women from Ifugao, who have their own social protection traditions;
3) the PATAMABA chapter in La Union, whose leaders and members are also
involved in the ORT community-based health micro-insurance scheme called
OHPS (promoted as a model by ILO-STEP); 4) the community-based health
micro- insurance scheme in Angono, Rizal called AHMI, being launched under
the auspices of the ILO-STEP project involving PATAMABA members, who are
simultaneously the proponents of a 300-unit housing project being developed
by the local government in cooperation with the National Home Mortgage
and Finance Corporation; 5) the highly successful microfinance program
of PATAMABA Region VI in Iloilo and Antique, which has integrated damayan
or mutual aid, and is supplemented by an aggressive campaign to enroll
members in the Social Security System (SSS), Philhealth and Red Cross;
and 6) the Balingasa chapter in the National Capital Region, many of whom
have become members of the (SSS) through the ADA (automatic debit account)
program in partnership with PS Bank.
Lessons Learned
* Building on the strong rural tradition of community-based solidarity
is a good start.
The gains in addition to the direct benefits given to the membership
are: the security among the members that they will be provided financial
assistance in times of dire financial need; the reinforcement of the spirit
of “bayanihan” among the members of the community; the realization
that as an organized group, the women have a stronger voice on issues
affecting the community.
* Tradition can be both a boon and a burden among indigenous communities.
The tradition of “hablag” and “pinagpagan” is
an indigenous way of social protection because help in times of deaths
and sickness comes with the culture. Since it is unwritten and not covered
by enforceable laws, it may not be able to withstand social and environment
change. Ifugao migrants are not too keen about continuing the tradition
because of the expense involved. Thus, there is need to veer towards alternative
forms of protection, such as membership in SSS and Philhealth.
* Social security is tied up with income and employment security.
The sustainability of contributions to the SSS and Philhealth (Apugan),
to the ORT Health Plus Scheme (Bariquir), and to the SSS ADA program (Balingasa
and Angono) is considered to be at great risk because of the employment
(and therefore income) insecurity of members. Without reserve funds set
aside from a reasonably regular source, contributions cannot be sustained.
* Sustained networking and advocacy at both national and local levels
lead to results over the long run.
Lobbying for social protection coverage began in the early 1990s, yielding
positive results only in the mid-90s. Friendlier mechanisms and burden
sharing were promoted only in 2002, largely through the combined efforts
of informal worker organizations converging in the National Anti-Poverty
Commission (NAPC). At the local level, the campaign for extending membership
in micro-health insurance schemes, must be relentlessly pursued by the
community in order for them to be secure during times of illness, death
or calamity.
* Asset reform is essential.
The Community Mortgage Program in Angono, Rizal is viewed as the national
government’s response to the issue of asset reform that aims to
benefit the poor. This advocacy through its implementation by the local
governments, will hopefully address the critical issue of having permanent
shelter. Its realization will free the poor from worries of eviction and
increasing house rentals.
* Gender issues as well as child issues need to be addressed.
Results show that rural women are more burdened with physically demanding
reproductive work which their men, who are more conservative than those
in urban areas , do not share. Their stress levels are greater, and these
are manifested in the form of fatigue and other symptoms of overwork.
The salaries of female day-care workers are also very low compared to
other positions in the barangay which men hold. Clearly, it is difficult
to organize and explore alternative livelihood for men because of the
latter’s drinking habits. There are also areas where violence against
women and children as well as prostitution and child labor thrive. These
have to be treated as risks that also need to be addressed.
* Discipline and regularity of collection are important.
The experience thus far shows that the PATAMABA Region VI has the capacity
to make a small microfinance fund grow and to use it well, even integrating
a damayan fund. PATAMABA client borrowers have also shown exemplary credit
discipline and can absorb higher loans if given the opportunity. The secret
is a combination of incentives and sanctions that has proven to be effective
in motivating microfinance participants not to default or to unduly delay
payments.
* There is a need for scaling up to address poverty and ensure sustainability.
Some borrowers in the PATAMABA microfinance program already have the
need and the capability to borrow more and would gladly transfer to PATAMABA
if only the latter had as much to loan out. The break-out level from the
poverty cycle has been pegged at P54,000 borrowing rate. At that level,
collection for the damayan fund could also be at a reasonably adequate
level to address the most urgent risks. Clearly, there is a long way to
go, beginning with the exploration of sources for much larger lending
funds.

|