Introduction
There are about 7-9 million homebased workers in the Philippines
doing both piece-rated and own account work in rural and urban areas.
Like many others working in the informal economy, they suffer from
invisibility, poor working and living conditions, lack of resources
and social protection.
Pambansang Tagapag-ugnay ng mga Manggagawa sa Bahay (PATAMABA)
Inc. or the National Network of Homeworkers, was founded in May
1989 with the objective of creating, strengthening, consolidating
and expanding the national network of homebased workers and providing
support services for their personal, social and economic well-being.
PATAMABA helps homebased workers form self-sustaining groups at
the grassroots level. At the policy level, it acta to raise awareness
about homebased workers and to bring about the necessary policy
changes for the benefit of this informal sector.
PATAMABA has a total membership of about 14,138, 98 percent of
whom are women as end of 2003 in its formal registry. Most of these
women work in garments, footwear, bamboo, weaving, toy-making, food
processing, handicraft and other cottage industries. In addition,
the PATAMABA youth sector has been actively recruiting from among
their ranks, and has reported a membership of at least 2,000.
PATAMABA’s key initiatives include education and training,
socio-economic assistance, networking and advocacy, social protection
and the empowerment of women.
History
It all started in 1975, I when a group of rural women founded the
Association of the New Filipina (known as KaBaPa), to work for equality,
development and peace as laid down by the United Nations in its
declaration of International Women’s Year.
In the 1980s, community organizers from the KaBaPa together with
researchers from the University of the Philippines (UP) came to
know that thousands of women, even in the remotest of villages,
did farmed-out work for exporters and local manufacturers. These
women embroidered dresses and tablecloths, and sewed children’s
clothes and schoolbags. They were also weavers, food producers/processors,
and makers of handicrafts, footwear, novelty items, fashion accessories
and furniture.
Common features observed in this group of women homeworkers were
low piece rates, poor working conditions, lack of access to resources
and to social protection, lack of proper organization and an absence
of awareness about their rights as workers and women. Many of them
were being exploited by profit-hungry middlemen and exporters; their
work was enriching many foreign importers and Filipino traders.
For example, some of them who made baby dresses earned a measly
ten US cents for a product sold for 15 US dollars at US department
stores.
The KaBaPa realized that it had a large number of homeworkers among
its ranks. When the International Labour Organization (ILO) asked
KABAPA leaders to work on a project to organize homebased workers
in 1988, they quickly consented.
During a meeting convened by KABAPA of 29 homebased worker-leaders
from nine provinces, it became evident that homebased work was a
widespread phenomenon in the Philippines and that they all shared
similar circumstances and needs. They also realized that they were
in many ways ‘invisible’ to the rest of society, especially
policy-makers, and that if they wanted to better their lives, they
would have to organize themselves at a national level. With this
realization, Pambansang Tagapag-ugnay ng mga Manggagawa sa Bahay
(PATAMABA), the National Network of Homeworkers, was born.
PATAMABA was first formed as a committee within KaBaPa. Later,
in May 1989, PATAMABA Inc. became independent. It, however, continues
to work in close collaboration with KaBaPa.
The (ILO), together with KaBaPa, the University of the Philippines,
and the Department of Labour and Employment (DOLE), launched Program
HOPE aimed at organizing and assisting homeworkers in the Philippines.
A systematic awareness raising campaign for homeworkers, with special
emphasis on women, was set in motion.
For the women themselves, this was the first time they actually
began to think of themselves as workers rather than just rural women/housewives
with special needs and rights. They saw themselves contributing
so much to the national economy yet remained neglected, unrecognized,
and invisible in national statistics.
|