![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
January 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The FGD with the local government of Mojokerto City , East Java, in May 2009 resulted in the legal recognition of Mojokerto City HWPRI. Likewise, MWPRI was expected to do another research that will lead to a draft social protection policy for homebased and informal workers. MWPRI organized a social protection workshop where the research results on homebased workers in several cities were presented to Indonesia’s Women Empowerment Minister, December 2008. After the workshop, the group was tasked to conduct a follow up research towards the drafting of an economic and social protection policy for women homebased workers in the informal economy. Exclusion of Homebased Workers However, there is no social protection scheme nor program that specifically targets the workers in the informal economy. Not even under the Labour and Transmigrant Minister Act 24/2006, the Social Protection for Workers Who Work With No Industrial Relationship Program Implementation Standard. Informal workers comprised 62% of the workforce in 2007, and more than half of these are homeworkers, who are paid below the minimum wage regulation, without occupational safety and health protection. Under this situation, can the homeworkers ever gain access to their social protection rights? The philosophy of social protection is to protect all the people of Indonesia. Under the 1945 Constitution, Chapter 5 (2), Chapter 20, Chapter 28H (1), (2), (3), and Chapter 34 (1), people are protected from socio-economic and political risks. According to the ILO, social security should be universal and the implementation depends on the approach of each country. Acts on Social Protection In October 2004, the government released the 40/2004 Acts on the National Social Protection System or SJSN (Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional). This was a radical change because this time, all Indonesian citizens are being granted access to a social protection system. The old Social Protection System provides protection to formal workers through the Labor’s Social Protection (Jamsostek); the state and federal staff through Pension Savings (Taspen); and Health Insurance (Askes), Indonesia National Army through Indonesia National Army Insurance (ASABRI).
Upon closer scrutiny, Chapters 2 and 3 of 40/2004 Acts show that social protection will be extended under certain conditions such as sickness, accident, loss of job, old age, etc. While the said legislation is a big step ahead, millions of Indonesian workers are still fighting for the revision of the Minimum Wages Regulation, which is based on the 17/2005 Indonesia Labor and Transmigration Decree. Many observed that the 40/2004 Acts is better than the 17/2005 Decree because when seen from the minimum wages regulation aspect, 17/2005 Decree covers just a single worker, but 40/2004 Acts includes the worker and family members. The 40/2004 Acts exists to remove the dichotomy between formal and informal workers, as can be seen in Chapter 1, Number 8:“The participant is everyone, including the foreigners working in Indonesia for a minimum of 6 (six) months, and pay the member’s contribution fee.” The 40/2004 Acts simply requires registering and payment of member’s contribution to the Social Protection Institution, then the single identity number will be given to the participant and all family members. Among the HBWs, wages are far below the minimum wage. How can they afford to pay their contribution fee? The 40/2004 Acts Chapter 13 and 14 explain the procedure: The employer must register the employee to the National Social Protection Institutions and pay the member’s contribution fee. The contribution fee is based on the share of the employer and employee agreement. For subcontracted homebased workers, their wages are very small and even far below the minimum wages. If the wage is cut for contribution fee, will there be money left? Government must pay for contributions of people who live in extreme poverty; it should also open the opportunity for HBWs to access social protection.
But, until the deadline of the 40/2004 implementation, October 19, 2009, there has been no concrete step and regulation to operate the National Social Protection System. In order to realize the gains, there must be changes in the regulations, and a strong willingness to improve the HBWs’ welfare and to increase their bargaining position. The HBWs should not be excluded, marginalized and subordinated in the development process of Indonesia. Speaking in unison, HBWs need to work for (1) rati-fication of the ILO Convention 177 on Home Work, to give protection to homebased workers to help them achieve a decent life;.and (2) the concrete implementation of 40/2004 Acts on The National Social Protection System before the October 19, 2009 deadline.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright
@2006 MWPRI |
||||||||||||||||||||||||