INTRODUCTION
Home work is a substantial part of the worldwide
informal economy, which is growing rapidly and is characterised
by unregulated, and often inhuman, working conditions.
The Home Work Convention’s relationship to other ILO Conventions
The Home Work Convention (C177) was adopted at
the ILO’s International Labour Conference in 1996. It is a
response to a changing, global world of work, marked by the increasing
casualisation of labour. For working people, globalisation often
means deregulation and thus massive cuts in pay, social security
and occupational health and safety, and in access to training and
qualifications. The Home Work Convention applies not just to one
sector, but universally, to all homeworkers. It therefore complements
other ILO Conventions und guarantees the applicability of core labour
standards and other standards to millions of homeworkers. The aim
is that homeworkers should be treated equally with other workers,
particularly as regards:
(a) the homeworkers' right to establish or join organisations
of their own choosing and to participate in the activities of
such organisations;
(b) protection against discrimination in employment and occupation;
(c) protection in the field of occupational safety and health;
(d) remuneration;
(e) statutory social security protection;
(f) access to training;
(g) minimum age for admission to employment or work; and
(h) maternity protection.
(Article 4 of the Home Work Convention)
The Home Work Convention is a particularly important one for workers
in the informal economy.
In view of globalisation, standards for those engaged
in the informal economy are becoming more and more important. Homeworkers
account for a major proportion of that informal workforce, particularly
in subcontracting for the garment and electrical industries. Although
no hard-and-fast statistics are available (see below), it is thought
that, for example, in Botswana 77% of all enterprises are located
in households. The corresponding figure for Kenya is 32%, for Lesotho
62%, Malawi 54%, South Africa 71%, Swaziland 68% and Zimbabwe 77%.
As part of the global division of labour, jobs are hived off. This
enables firms to avoid, for example, their responsibility to contribute
to these employees’ social security.
C177 is a Convention that provides protection in particular to
women in the informal economy.
According to estimates, 90% of all those engaged
in home work in Europe (Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy and the
Netherlands) are women. The same goes for 85% of homeworkers in
Argentina’s garment and footwear industry and 90% of those
making bidi (small cigars) in India.
Up until the 1970s, the target group for ILO Conventions
was male workers in waged employment and without family responsibilities.
By the beginning of the 1980s, the ILO was no longer focussing exclusively
on dependent employment, but on work in general. This was, for example,
reflected in the overhaul of the Employment (Women with Family Responsibilities)
Recommendation (1965), which was replaced in 1981 by C156 on Workers
with Family Responsibilities (1981).
Homework is essentially done by women. The adoption
of Convention No. 177 by the International Labour Conference in
1996 gave recognition to this form of work.
The Home Work Convention (C177) calls for the inclusion of home
work in the statistics.
As already indicated, the statistics on home work
are in a bad way. The same, incidentally, goes for the whole of
the informal sector. It is noticeable that statistics are always
lacking on those people who are at the bottom of the social hierarchy.
For instance, business and governments have a wealth of statistics
available to them on the trade in goods worldwide. And statistical
information is vital as a basis for political action. So the importance
of collecting data on the number and the extent of atypical forms
of employment cannot be overstated.
Article 6 of C177 says: “Appropriate measures
shall be taken so that labour statistics include, to the extent
possible, home work.”
Visibility – Discussion – Political Action
By its very nature, home work is invisible. From
the global perspective, home work is generally badly paid and makes
no provision either for an 8-hour day or for social security. The
working conditions are determined by the circumstances in which
the home workers live. Overheads, such as heating, electricity and
rent have to be covered by the homeworkers themselves. They also
have to bear the market risks, because they are employed only when
the goods that they produce are immediately saleable on the market.
Their isolated work situation makes it more difficult for them to
organise in order to improve their bargaining power.
As a result of the adoption of the Home Work Convention
by the International Labour Conference in 1996,* there were many
articles and discussions about home work. But if you look for up-to-date
articles on the same topic these days, you will search in vain –
even though the situation of homeworkers worldwide has not improved.
Quite the reverse.
Ratification would relaunch discussions on this issue.
*For the debate on this, and the voting patterns, see the section:
“Summary of the arguments made for and against ratification
of the Home Work Convention (C177) during the 1996 ILC.
|